Why use a pile of rocks when you can bend a tree and wait 50 years for it to be recognizable? Especially in New Hampshire
I think we have been duped!
A while back Michelle and I saw a post about “Indian Marker Trees” from a very reputable source. We made our mental notes of what to look for and started keeping an eye out, without doing any background research.
Today, We found a real “Indian Marker Tree” – for what its worth.
For more pretty pictures, or a hardcover book you can purchase with lots of pretty pictures of bent trees, check out Native American Trail Marker Trees: marking Paths Through The Wilderness This also happens to be a book about them, which I have not read. Its a good description on amazon however, tells me there are 250 color and black and white pictures 🙂
Our tree matches every definition of “Indian Marker Tree”. But its likely not one, and its more likely they may not exist at all. If you see these a lot, or know of more details, please comment and let us know. I would like more feedback before you get all pissed off, or after, whichever you prefer.
First, there is a controversy over whether these were actually man made in the first place. In this specific location, there is a large history of Abenaki about a mile away. This photo was taken in Tuftonboro, NH. Mr. Google shows lots of books, websites, and blogs about these trees being actual trail markers, but nothing before about 1850. In my area, the Abenaki were forced out in 1696, and records show small groups traveled back to the area until about 1911. My photos lack a few characteristics. First, tree species: My immediate tree ID was white ash, I still think it is an ash. It could be a white oak, as white oak was the dominant species all around this particular hemlock seepage, with a few white ash mixed in. We will go back soon and pay more attention. I don’t think this would qualify for a 200+ year old white ash, let alone nearly 300. If it was white oak, it could be- the leaf litter around it is all white oak. Still, unlikely to be the correct age. This tree has the correct scarring to be a “marker tree”. It has the “nose”, the two 90 degree bends, and the scarring on the “message” angle. Another issue arises when you can account for all of these features naturally. As mentioned in the comments, all of these features can be created by a sapling being pinned by a larger falling tree, growing a new trunk straight upward, and the old trunk rotting away.
Second: I called some people who know about these things. A good friend of mine was an archaeologist who studied colonial and native american sites in New England professionally. He has worked on many of the regional Native American village sites, as well as other early colonial digs. He said directly: “Nope”. I asked if this whole marker tree thing was BS, he said yes. I also asked my mentor about it (PhD in mycology, wetlands scientist etc). He had never heard of marker trees. I sent him a bunch of links- to which he responded, “OK, Im potentially sold on the Idea, but not around here, I have seen trees in the midwest and other parts of the country that might qualify, but the reasons given would not be applicable here”.
In summary, this particular tree, and each and every tree I have been able to find online to research has a potential natural explanation. Unfortunately I have not been able to find any verified historical records of intentional creation of these trees, at least in the northeast. I must conclude, unless other evidence is given, that this is a natural occurrence, and I appreciate any feedback in this matter.
As my mentor put it: Hurricane of ’38 created a lot of these!”
For a Hardcover book you can purchase with lots of pretty pictures of bent trees, check out Native American Trail Marker Trees: marking Paths Through The Wilderness
Latest posts by Keith (see all)
- A few finds during the winter in New Hampshire - March 28, 2016
- Native American Trail Marker Trees, (Indian Marker Tree, Indian Trail Marker) - February 28, 2016
- A few ferns for fun - February 12, 2016